In Memoriam Ffs

On Apr 16, 2015, President Obama signed into constabulary H.R. 2, the Medicare Access too CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), effectively sentencing Fee for Service (FFS) to death. The best explanation for how FFS is destroying the patch comes from Charles Munger, vice-chairman of Berkshire Hathaway too ad-hoc wellness luminary, who is equating what American doctors do, to raising rattlesnakes then they tin collect the bounty for dead rattlers offered yesteryear the authorities inward an endeavour to scrap a growing serpent problem. Based on this, too other every bit compelling insights, FFS was constitute responsible for willful devastation of our corking nation.

H5N1 few months earlier Congress delivered its coup de grâce to the FFS system, the Secretary of Health too Human Services, explained to the elite grouping of NEJM paying customers, how “30% of Medicare payments should live on tied to character or value through option payment models yesteryear 2016 (50% yesteryear 2018)”. Other than transforming traditional Medicare into a vintage 1990s HMO, the Secretary intends to build for certain that “the same novel option payment models too payment reforms are broadly adopted yesteryear a critical majority of payers”, effectively transitioning the entire dry reason into managed care. Just similar that.

By faith, too religious belief alone, embrace, believing where nosotros cannot prove

The start MACRA choice for physicians to acquire their niggling Medicare bonuses is to participate inward an option payment model (APM), where doctors behaviour similar miniature insurance companies, too furnish tending based on audio actuarial principles. Somewhere, somehow, individual figured out that fragmenting insurance pools into tiny groups of insureds provides improve “value to consumers” than having large too various insurance pools. The same architects of wellness tending improvement, decided that having each accountable tending organisation (ACO) purchase, implement too deal carve upward instances of  hugely sophisticated too rattling expensive actuarial (a.k.a. analytics or population management) software is some other corking way to add together “value to consumers”. 

The latest give-and-take close APM results comes from a research study sponsored yesteryear the American Medical Association, conducted yesteryear the RAND Corporation too published prior to the passage of the FFS killing legislation. To build a long too fascinating flush short, too I highly recommend that yous read this report, hither are the telephone substitution findings:

• APMs did non substantially alter how physicians delivered face-to-face patient care
• APMs increased the overall quantity too intensity of physician function because of growing patient book expectations too ongoing describe per unit of measurement area for physicians to practise at the “top of license”
• Physicians inward practise leadership positions were optimistic too enthusiastic close APMs
• Physicians non inward leadership positions expressed apprehension amongst APMs (and resignation), because of additional burdens they did non believe would improve patient care
• APMs caused practices to merge, acquire affiliated amongst or acquire owned yesteryear hospitals, to enable working capital missive of the alphabet investments inward computers too information infrastructure, to improve negotiate amongst wellness plans too to mitigate fear
• APMs had negligible effects on the aggregate income of private physicians, since fiscal incentives were non passed through to physicians
• The greatest fiscal incentive facing nearly all physicians inward APMs  was to increment “productivity” as measured yesteryear revenues or relative value units (RVUs)

In summary, it seems that APMs are good positioned to alter absolutely nothing, amongst the possible exceptions of increased prices for medical services due to consolidation too the massive burnout of doctors, piece providing a steady rootage of authorities too wellness programme “incentives” to pay for to a greater extent than computers too to a greater extent than administrators.

H5N1 brand novel study of 32 Pioneer ACOs, published this calendar month inward NEJM, calculates that on average the ACOs generated 1.2% savings, simply about $120 per fellow member per year, inward 2012, amongst no substantial changes to “quality” as measured yesteryear mammography screenings too lab testing frequency. Another, even newer study of the same 32 Pioneer ACOs, paid for yesteryear CMS too published inward JAMA, constitute that the same 32 Pioneer ACOs generated simply about $427 per fellow member per yr savings, inward 2012, amongst slight improvements inward patients perception of their experience. The JAMA study looked at 2013 as well, too constitute a precipitous drib inward savings to simply $135 per fellow member per year.

Both studies admit 2 glaring limitations. First, Pioneer ACOs were handpicked yesteryear CMS to live on those organizations most probable to live on successful from the acquire go. Second, these savings, or rather differentials inward growth of expenditures, do non line organisation human relationship for costs to laid upward too run an ACO. The to a greater extent than flattering JAMA study estimates $385 i K one thousand inward savings over the 2 years flow for 32 Pioneer ACOs. This translates into an average $6 i K one thousand savings per ACO per year. H5N1 separate report from the National Association of ACOs, estimates ACO costs inward yr one, ranging from $300,000 for a modest ACO upward to $6,700,000 for larger ones. The Pioneer ACOs inward the JAMA study were rather large, amongst over 20,000 lives per ACO on average. Note that these costs do non include the costs to Medicare to run too administer the ACO programs. Put it all together, too this is starting to facial expression to a greater extent than similar robbing patients too doctors to pay for, yous guessed it, to a greater extent than computers too to a greater extent than administrators.

The instant choice to acquire your MACRA incentives is the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). The construction of the MIPS is a monumental tour de forcefulness inward micro management, petty vindictiveness too accounting, that combines all electrical current Medicare initiatives (i.e. PQRS, value-based payment modifiers, meaningful use, too practise improvements) into i monster computer program designed to force all doctors into run a peril assuming APMs. If yous are a glutton for punishment, yous tin read the English linguistic communication language translation, provided yesteryear the Ways too Means Committee. The only certainty hither is that implementing this temporary payment scheme is going to cost taxpayers, straight too generally indirectly, to a greater extent than than the amount of incentives slated for payment to physicians, amongst practically all additional expenditures to flow, nonetheless again, to to a greater extent than computers too to a greater extent than administrators.

But FFS volition rise, on stepping-stones of its dead self, to higher things

Whereas paying doctors a fixed fee for each service is considered an unholy abomination, paying Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, Teladoc, American Well, too the like, a fixed fee for each service is considered a Culture of Health. In a new too groundbreaking report sponsored too published yesteryear the esteemed Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), a bunch of line organisation consultants are making recommendations to the large box retail clinics manufacture on how to elevate their value proffer too “become a much to a greater extent than powerful enabler of a Culture of Health”.  Recommendations make from steadily increasing complexity of services provided yesteryear non-physicians inward retail settings, to include chronic tending management, too wellness tending for children (casually dismissing recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics), to bundling too upselling “health” foods to patients.

Since telehealth is hotter than molten lava nowadays, the written report includes analysis of the incredible cheapness of telehealth services “at retail clinics too beyond”. Before proceeding to recommendations close lobbying province legislators too world payers to allow too pay for unfettered access to telehealth services, the RWJF written report is informing us that “the most mutual diagnoses made during telehealth visits are sinusitis, cold, flu, pertussis, too urinary tract infections—conditions also oft treated at retail clinics”[emphasis added]. This chip was copied too pasted from an every bit insightful marketing piece for the telehealth manufacture written yesteryear an proficient actuary. It took major endeavour to confine my urge to telephone phone the White House too inquire the President to declare a national province of emergency too close downward every port of entry into the continental United States.

Just the facts ma’am

One would promise that the determination to eliminate FFS for doctors was based on something other than rattlesnake fables too whooping coughing pandemics. One would also promise that determination makers observed too learned from, or at the rattling to the lowest degree considered, wellness systems of other wealthy nations that are supposedly improve too cheaper. One would live on wrong. According to the latest Commonwealth Fund international written report on wellness tending systems, it seems that many of those enlightened too inexpensive nations pay doctors generally amongst FFS, some alone so, specially Germany, the economical powerhouse of the European Union. For some argue FFS seems to bring no devilish toxic effects exterior the international borders of the United States.

(click icon to enlarge)

You may live on tempted to blame the misunderstanding on clueless bureaucrats, accountants too edible bean counters who don’t empathize patient care. You would live on incorrect again. Bureaucrats empathize numbers. They empathize fiscal too operational charts too tables, improve than doctors do. The argue FFS is beingness killed off inward America is non then nosotros tin attain improve results at lower costs as other developed countries bring consistently done. FFS for physicians, too only for physicians, is beingness eliminated then nosotros tin coil out the cheapest possible substitute to medical care, too frankly dearest doctor, amongst all due respect, you're inward the way.